Hi,
Is the concept of Emulator and simulator in mainframe same? If I say I am using a simulator to connect to mainframes or if I say I am using an emulator to connect to mainframes, do they carry same or similar meaning? I have seen many people using them interchangeably..
Emulator and simulator in mainframe.
-
- Registered Member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2013 1:30 pm
- Robert Sample
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:22 am
- Location: Dubuque Iowa
Re: Emulator and simulator in mainframe.
In my mind the two terms are NOT interchangeable. The term "emulator" is most commonly associated with 3270 terminal access to a mainframe, where the Windows / Unix software is emulating a 3270 terminal and hence 3270 data streams are going from / to the mainframe and the Windows / Unix software interprets the 3270 data stream for the GUI. The term "simulator" is associated with Hercules-390, which simulates a mainframe through software on a PC or Unix machine. Given an operating system, a Hercules-390 machine acts very closely to the same as a mainframe (although there are differences).
- enrico-sorichetti
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 843
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: Emulator and simulator in mainframe.
I do not know who made the association, but Hercules is an emulator ..The term "simulator" is associated with Hercules-390, which simulates a mainframe through software on a PC or Unix machine. Given an operating system, a Hercules-390 machine acts very closely to the same as a mainframe (although there are differences).
http://www.hercules-390.org
An emulation is a system that behaves exactly like something else, and adheres
to all of the rules of the system being emulated.
It is effectively a complete replication of another system, right down to being
binary compatible with the emulated system's inputs and outputs, but operating
in a different environment to the environment of the original emulated system.
The rules are fixed, and cannot be changed, or the system fails.
if You log-in to TSO on a <OS> running under Hercules what You see and get is EXACTLY what You would see and get
if You had logged-in to TSO on a <OS> running on a real mainframe
cheers
enrico
When I tell somebody to RTFM or STFW I usually have the page open in another tab/window of my browser,
so that I am sure that the information requested can be reached with a very small effort
enrico
When I tell somebody to RTFM or STFW I usually have the page open in another tab/window of my browser,
so that I am sure that the information requested can be reached with a very small effort

-
- Registered Member
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 7:56 pm
Re: Emulator and simulator in mainframe.
We call Tn3270 as emulator and I think that correct way of saying is "I am using an emulator to connect to mainframes".If I say I am using a simulator to connect to mainframes or if I say I am using an emulator to connect to mainframes, do they carry same or similar meaning? I have seen many people using them interchangeably..
-
- Registered Member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2013 1:30 pm
Re: Emulator and simulator in mainframe.
So Rumba, TN3270 etc all are emulators and not simulators?Right?enrico-sorichetti wrote:I do not know who made the association, but Hercules is an emulator ..The term "simulator" is associated with Hercules-390, which simulates a mainframe through software on a PC or Unix machine. Given an operating system, a Hercules-390 machine acts very closely to the same as a mainframe (although there are differences).
http://www.hercules-390.org
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute